Man, Shania Twain felt like trying something new.
After all, the "You're Still The One" singer swapped out her usual highlighted curly locks for a daring chocolate hue with full fringe bangs for...
Even the idea of Nicholas Galitzine’s buff transformation is grueling.
The Idea of You actor detailed how he achieved his ripped physique for his role as He-Man, a.k.a. Prince Adam of Eternia,...
John Travolta is revealing the phenomenal vision behind his Cannes Film Festival look.
After the Phenomenon star stepped out at the prestigious screening event donning a new look, which included...
Paris Hilton’s latest hair transformation is simply fabulous.
The Simple Life alum debuted her darkest hair color in years as she walked the runway at the Gucci Cruise 2027 collection fashion...
Danielle Jonas is putting her pom poms up for Kevin Jonas.
The Jonas Brothers member—who shares daughters Alena, 12, and Valentina, 9, with Danielle—showed off his ripped body transformation, and...
MAY 14 — Have you seen the number of school books kids in national schools (from as young as Standard 1) are required to bring to school?
Some of them look like they’re hauling luggage in the airport for a two-month trip in Rome. Is all this backpack-like activity helpful for the spines and backs of eight- and nine-year-olds?
Most importantly, is there some reason why e-textbooks remain like something from the far future? Have we not entered the digital age like, uh, two decades ago?
Note that at present the only government initiative on digital textbooks is DELIMa (Digital Education Learning Initiative Malaysia, see note 1). This is the Ministry of Education’s main digital learning portal (rebranded from earlier MOE Digital Learning efforts post-Frog VLE).
It provides access to hundreds of digital textbooks along with other resources like interactive modules, videos, and tools from partners such as Google, Microsoft, and Apple.
However, this platform is only a supplementary or optional resource for most primary and secondary schools. Long and short, students still need to lug their backpack-like bags to school almost every day.
More than a decade ago marketing author Seth Godin already proposed that schools produce PDF versions of textbooks, send these to kids and update them as and when necessary.
Also, with the explosion of video lessons, interactive learning websites, educational games, etc you really wonder if buying (let alone hauling) huge textbooks is absolutely necessary at all.
Tech guru Kevin Kelly even talked about the screening phenomenon in which the future will consist of accessing information, images and messages from “wherever” (phone, office walls, traffic junctions, etc.), after which they can do mash-ups, share their work, etc.
In light of the advent of such a tech-soaked society, are physical textbooks really the best we can do?
Shouldn’t the education sector be preparing our kids where the ‘book’ is no longer delimited by physical binders, where information flows (from producer to producer) rather than remain static?
Isn’t the preference for physical textbooks (as opposed to e-textbooks) analogous to being stuck in an era of Encyclopædia Britannica (as opposed to Wikipedia)?
And need we even remind ourselves about the advent of AI and how that may completely transform education very, very soon?
Finally, wastage is a serious issue. Year after year, new copies (as in thousands and thousands of them) of the same books are printed then chucked aside after the final exam.
It would appear the only beneficiary of that are the book-sellers; the rest of society picks up the cost of this externality.
Quite a few private schools have already chucked aside physical textbooks. When will our public schools follow suit?
Check out DELIMa’s website at https://delima.moe-dl.edu.my/
* This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
Ryan Lochte is jumping into a sea of change.
Over a year after his wife Kayla Reid filed for divorce following seven years of marriage, the 12-time Olympic medalist announced a pivot in career,...
A friend sent me a William Blair research report this week that characterized enterprise AI adoption as “a mile wide and an inch deep.”
Just about every organization has started to use AI tools in some fashion. But there’s little orchestration of how those tools are actually used. And very little alignment across the enterprise.
A 2025 MIT report suggested that 95% of enterprise Generative AI pilots failed to deliver significant ROI or move beyond experimentation. The report flags not the quality of the tools, but to strategic misalignment as the primary driver.
Of course, strategic misalignment is an age-old challenge for organizations. AI acceleration just further exposes the rift.
Hugh Derrick at eatbigfish recently pointed to Harvard Business Review research that strategic alignment is up to 3X lower than leaders think. As he put it:
“So when you layer AI-driven speed on top, you don’t magically become more effective. You run the risk of getting faster at being inconsistent (and yes, you’ll create a lot more ‘stuff’ along the way)…
“And it matters most in big, complex organizations where silos already slow everything down. When 30% of senior leaders point to silos as a root cause of productivity stagnation, and two‑thirds say their organizations are overly complex, adding more speed to a fragmented system doesn’t fix the system. It just creates more noise.”
Here are a few related cartoons I’ve drawn over the years:
The post Misalignment at Speed first appeared on Marketoonist | Tom Fishburne.
Login