People told not to enter damaged buildings for fear of aftershocks from magnitude-7.8 quake
At least 37 people have died and hundreds have been injured after a magnitude-7.8 earthquake shook part of the southern Philippines early on Monday, collapsing buildings and triggering tsunami alerts.
The quake hit early in the morning about 20km (12.4 miles) off the coast of Sarangani province, with tremors felt strongly across Mindanao and 420km away in the city of Manado on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi.
Earthquake was region’s strongest tremor in nearly 150 years and was also felt in parts of Mexico including Cancún
An earthquake on Monday off the coast of Cuba, which was that region’s strongest tremor in nearly 150 years, could be felt in Florida and parts of Mexico.
The 6.1-magnitude earthquake, which struck in the afternoon, occurred approximately 65 miles (105km) north-west of Mantua, Cuba, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). The USGS added that the earthquake had a depth of 16 miles.
A new study (Sun et al. 2026) shows that in six earthquakes in China between 2010 and 2022, landslides and rockfalls were responsible for at least half of the total fatalities.
It is well-established that landslides are a major cause of loss of life in earthquakes in mountainous areas. The seismology maxim that “it is not earthquakes that kill people, it’s collapsing buildings” does not apply in its pure form in mountains – landslides also kill large numbers of people.
An earthquake triggered landslide from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.
However, the actual number of people killed by landslides in earthquakes is poorly understood. This is largely due to the challenges of collecting reliable information in the aftermath of a major earthquake, when the focus is on rescue and recovery rather than data collection. For this reason, many studies of landslide fatalities do not include seismically-triggered events. This is true of my own work.
However, a study has just been published (Sun et al. 2026) in the journal Natural Hazards Review that starts to address this issue. The paper nominally examines fatalities from all causes from earthquakes in China from 2001 to 2022. However, the authors note that the data has low reliability until 2010, so I’ll focus on the period from 2010 to 2022. I also note that the authors use the term “geological hazards“, which is a little broader than landslides. I should note that the paper isa broad look at fatalities from earthquakes – there is a much richer range of analyses than I will cover here.
In the period from 2010 to 2022, Sun et al. (2026) identified 14 earthquakes in which geological hazards caused loss of life. In some cases, the impacts were substantial. Thus, the M=6.5 3 August 2014 earthquake at Ludian in Yunnan led to 134 fatalities and 40 people missing from geological hazards from a total of 728 fatalities (c.24 % of the total), whilst the 5 September 2022 M=6.8 earthquake at Luding in Sichuan led to 76 geological hazard fatalities and 25 missing from a total of 118 fatalities (c.86% of the total). In six of the 14 examples, geological hazards caused at least 50% of the fatalities.
Sun et al. (2026) highlight that “fatalities from geological hazards concentrate in geologically complex, mountainous provinces, i.e., Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, Guangxi, and Guizhou”. They note that even small events can trigger fatal landslides – for example, six people were killed in a rockfall triggered by a M=4.3 earthquake in Guizhou in 2010, whilst a M=2.8 aftershock from the Yanjin earthquake in 2006 triggered a rockfall that killed a person.
This is an incredibly useful study. It starts to shed light on the impact of landslides in large earthquakes. It is not the definitive study, and questions remain – not least, the pattern of landslide losses in very large earthquakes, like the 2010 Wenchuan event, in which landslides were ferocious. But it forms the basis for such investigations, starting to fill a major gaps in our understanding.
Roughly the size of Texas, the Karoo Basin of central western South Africa is brutally dry, sparsely populated, and known in part for its potentially “massive” hydrocarbon deposits.
South Africa, which consumes more energy than any other country in sub-Saharan Africa, has shown a growing interest in commercial fracking for shale gas and oil across the Karoo hinterland, with the country moving in late 2025 to lift a 13-year ban on shale gas exploration in the area.
However, a recent study from the University of Cape Town, published in Seismological Research Letters, cautioned that the Karoo might not be as seismologically calm as it appears, meaning fracking efforts could have the potential to induce earthquakes in the region.
A Swarm of Earthquakes
The researchers observed 66 earthquakes in this cluster between 2007 and 2022, ranging from 0.7 to 4.8 in magnitude.
The researchers investigated what they call a sudden swarm of earthquakes that occurred in the Leeu Gamka cluster, a region of the Karoo that was previously considered seismically stable. They observed 66 earthquakes in this cluster between 2007 and 2022, ranging from 0.7 to 4.8 in magnitude.
“The individual earthquakes here are very small,” said Alastair Sloan, a tectonics and structural geologist at the University of Cape Town.
Using ambient noise tomography, previous geophysical surveys, and information about the locations of past earthquakes, the researchers identified a critically stressed fault underlying the region. The fault appears to extend for at least 30 kilometers roughly west-northwest to east-northeast.
Looking at South Africa more generally, there are other places where there have been “fairly large” earthquakes with a similar orientation, Sloan said. He cited a series of large earthquakes in the early 20th century in a place called Koffiefontein, north of the study area, and the disastrous 1969 Tulbagh earthquake, west of the team’s study area.
Both of those earthquakes occurred in regions that are geologically similar to the Karoo, though they’re outside of the area being considered for shale gas exploration, Sloan said.
Fracking Risks?
In other parts of the globe, such as Oklahoma in the United States, processes related to oil and gas extraction have led to “induced earthquakes.” Most of these earthquakes have been triggered by wastewater disposal associated with oil production, not by fracking directly.
Researchers are unsure if industrial fluid injection in the Karoo, as is applied in shale gas fracking processes, could trigger significant seismic action in the region’s existing faults.
“Some locations which undergo shale gas development don’t see very much seismicity, and there is a catalog of things which need to be present for [seismicity] to be something that you would particularly worry about,” Sloan said.
For instance, if faults are only within the crystalline basement and therefore separated from the sedimentary layers where the fracking occurs, then it’s not likely they’ll be reactivated, because there’s no way for the fracking fluid to get down to the fault zone itself. Another factor, Sloan added, is that for significant earthquakes to occur, large faults that are already critically stressed need to be present in the region undergoing fracking.
The new study showed that both of these conditions may be met in the Karoo: Microseismicity does extend to the depths at which the carbonaceous shale is present. And this microseismicity is occurring on a reasonably extensive structure with a similar orientation to larger earthquakes that have already occurred in the region.
However, Sloan stressed, this isn’t a cause for immediate panic.
“I don’t want to be too alarmist; the size of the structure revealed by the microseismicity is not huge, and so we do not have evidence to expect an earthquake much larger than the damaging historical earthquakes that we have already seen in the wider region,” he said. “Globally, large earthquakes triggered by fracking (rather than associated deep wastewater exposure) are very rare, but the study suggests the necessary preconditions are present. And so the possibility needs to be considered and monitored carefully.”
Not Unique
Raymond Durrheim, a geoscientist and the South African Research Chair in Exploration, Earthquake and Mining Seismology at the University of the Witwatersrand, and who also examined the Ph.D. thesis on which the new study is based, said no area is perfectly seismically quiet.
“We know the way seismicity works in this whole area of southern Africa is that swarms occur,” he said. “They’ll last for years or even decades, and then they’ll die away. This is not a unique occurrence.”
This study was “useful,” though, Durrheim added, especially with the possibility of shale gas development in the Karoo. “It’s very important that we understand this because we know that when you inject fluid under high pressure, there’s always a chance you could trigger an earthquake,” he said, noting examples of fluid injection triggering earthquakes in places such as Canada. “It’s always a risk.”
To mitigate risks, Sloan suggested it would be useful to have a much denser network of seismometers within this region of South Africa.
Citation: Mwareya, R. (2026), A swarm of earthquakes in South Africa’s Karoo Basin poses questions for oil and gas development, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260159. Published on 20 May 2026.
As the Indian and Eurasian continental plates collide, the Tibetan Plateau is slowly deforming. For decades, geoscientists debated how this deformation occurs: Is the plateau like a block of crumbly aged cheddar, deforming mostly at its faults, or is it more like French brie, moving like a very viscous liquid being pushed slowly to the east?
A new study published in Science shows that both theories are at work. The study’s findings provide the most comprehensive picture yet of the Tibetan Plateau’s deformation and offer valuable information for earthquake hazard assessments in the region.
The new model that combines the two theories is a “significant advance,” said Eric Fielding, a geodesist who was not involved in the study. Fielding is a staff member at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory but did not speak on behalf of the agency. “It’s clearly the result of a very large amount of work,” he said.
A Deformation Investigation
For decades, scientists have held differing views on the Tibetan Plateau’s deformation. One camp modeled the plateau’s deformation with movement occurring mostly at its faults, while the other modeled the movement like a thick fluid deforming areas beyond faults.
“These two communities have carried on modeling deformation in different ways” and have never fully resolved the differences between their models, said Tim Wright, a geodesist at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and lead author of the new study.
It’s tricky to measure the plateau’s deformation, though, because it changes so slowly: One of the fastest faults on the plateau, the Kunlun Fault, moves at about just 10 millimeters per year. “These are rates that are less than your fingernails growing,” Wright said.
And because much of the Tibetan Plateau’s terrain is inaccessible, there’s a dearth of ground-based stations to track movement, meaning most geodetic data for the area must come from satellites.
“It’s a boon for science to have that consistent acquisition of the same kind of data for 10 years.”
Tracking such nearly imperceptible movement with satellites hundreds of kilometers above requires enormous amounts of data collected over many years. Wright and his colleagues finally had those data after 10 years of observations from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-1 satellite mission, which launched in 2014.
“Because the signals are so small, you need to wait for some time before you accrue enough deformation that you can actually measure it,” Wright said. The 2014–2024 data they analyzed are “giving us a really clean signal,” he said.
“It’s a boon for science to have that consistent acquisition of the same kind of data for 10 years,” Fielding said.
Using tens of thousands of satellite images alongside ground-based satellite navigation system stations, Wright and the team constructed comprehensive velocity maps of the deformation of the plateau. Results showed that a mix of theories best describes the mechanism.
“We think what’s really happening is a combination of both,” Wright said.
Wright, who described himself as “formerly of the viscous deformation camp,” was surprised by the prominent role that faults played in the plateau’s deformation. Previously, he said, he would have described the faults as passive markers within the underlying flow of the landmass. But the data show that the faults influence a much broader area of the plateau: “The whole deformation of the plateau is influenced by those faults,” he said.
The study “shows clearly that these major fault systems are responsible for a large part of the strain within the plateau,” Fielding said.
Mapping Seismic Hazards
“We have very little information about the history of earthquakes on these faults in this area.”
Knowing how the plateau deforms can also help scientists create more accurate seismic hazard assessments for the millions of people who may be affected by earthquakes there, particularly at the edges of the plateau. “We have very little information about the history of earthquakes on these faults in this area,” Fielding said.
The research team is working with the Global Earthquake Model Foundation, a nonprofit earthquake research collaboration, and other organizations to incorporate their findings into hazard assessments.
Wright and the research team recently used a similar methodology to map the deformation field of the entire Alpine-Himalayan belt, which stretches from Spain to eastern China. The same methods could be used to map the deformation of the western United States, another area where both viscous and fault-related deformation may affect large population centers, Fielding said.
Citation: van Deelen, G. (2026), Weak faults play a strong role in the Tibetan Plateau’s deformation, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260162. Published on 22 May 2026.
Folarin Kolawole is one of 15 recipients of this year's National Geographic Society’s Wayfinder Award, which recognizes people whose work is expanding our understanding of the planet and helping to protect its future.
Here is a look at some of the most recent major earthquakes in the Philippines, which sits on the Pacific "Ring of Fire", is one of the world's most earthquake-prone countries.
To date news reports suggest two fatal landslides with a combined toll of 17 people.
There are various news reports trickling in about the landslides triggered by the 8 June 2026 M=7.8 earthquake offshore Mindanao in the Philippines. As usual, the remote locations of many of the landslides means that the information is a bit hit and miss at this point.
To date, the most serious event appears to have occurred at a community called New Aklan, located in Glan, Sarangani. It appears that New Aklan is at: [5.7705 N, 125.3356]. News reports indicate that 13 people were killed, although there are also indications of additional fatalities in this area.
A failure in a coastal cliff at Sitio Buhangin, Barangay Patuco, Sarangani following the 8 June 2026 earthquake near Mindanao. Image tweeted by Radyo Pilipinas.
Initial analyses suggest that the earthquake this morning has the potential to have triggered significant numbers of landslides and areas of liquefaction.
At the time of writing, the impacts of the M=7.8 earthquake that occurred offshore the south coast of Mindanao in the Philippines remain unclear. Initial reports in the local press suggest 15 fatalities so far, but as always it could be the case that there is no information from those areas most seriously impacted.
The USGS Pager site is the best source of information about potential landslide impacts, bearing in mind there is a high level of uncertainty. This estimates that the area exposed to landslides is at the high end of the “significant” scale and that the population exposed to landslides lies in the 1,000 to 10,000 people range. This is the Pager landslide hazard map:-
Initial Pager map of landslide hazard from the 8 June 2026 earthquake offshore Mindanao in the Philippines. Source: USGS.
The area with the highest level of landslide hazard is remote and rural, so we may not get good information from this area for a while.
The potential for liquefaction may be even more serious, with a broad swathe having a high level of hazard:-
Initial Pager map of liquefaction hazard from the 8 June 2026 earthquake offshore Mindanao in the Philippines. Source: USGS.
One final point to note is that the Philippines is just entering the typhoon season. Fortunately, Mindanao is sufficiently far south to be away from the main typhoon zone. However, these storms are so large that they can bring very heavy rainfall – see for example Typhoon Bopha in 2012. A similar event this year could have very significant consequences.
Source: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Earthquakes release energy and result in source properties defined across a wide range of scales that are not represented in conventional frictional laws. Norisugi and Noda [2026] introduce a new rate- and roughness-dependent friction (RRF) law which incorporates both effects from fault slip rate and multi-scale variation in fault topography. By limiting the number of state variables in the RRF formulation, the authors show with efficient earthquake cycle simulation that this multi-scale approach can reproduce a key observed relationship between fracture energy and fault slip.
Although further refinement is needed to better represent roughness evolution, this study marks a major advance in earthquake modeling by demonstrating the necessity and feasibility of incorporating multi-scale fault topography in the characterization of earthquake source process.
Citation: Norisugi, R., & Noda, H. (2026). Multi-scale rate- and roughness-dependent frictional constitutive law and dynamic earthquake sequence simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 131, e2025JB033580. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JB033580
In the winter of 923, a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck the heart of Puget Sound. Shorelines slid into the water, the seafloor rose up, and a tsunami swept through the region.
The Seattle fault zone, actually a mesh of faults that runs right under its eponymous city, was responsible for this quake. The fault continues to pose one of the deadliest threats to the Pacific Northwest; if a similar quake were to hit today, it would threaten millions of lives and cause billions of dollars in damage.
Two new papers dig into recurrence intervals, or the quiescent periods between earthquakes, for the Seattle fault zone. They offer good news and bad news: One study, published in Geology, found that in the past 11,000 years, the massive 923 event was the only quake of magnitude 7.5 or greater. The other study, published in GSA Bulletin, found that smaller, but still damaging, quakes occur more frequently than previously thought.
The new research indicates the worst-case scenario of frequent 923-style events is less likely than some scientists thought, said Harold Tobin, a geophysicist at the University of Washington and head of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, who was not involved in either study. But researchers also found that “the less worse, but still bad scenarios” are more likely than previously thought.
Meet the Seattle Fault
“For a fault that has had so much attention, there’s so much we still don’t know.”
The Seattle fault zone is a thrust fault system that stretches about 75 kilometers (46 miles) from the foothills of the Cascades east of Seattle to the Hood Canal, which runs along the shores of the Olympic Peninsula to the city’s west, passing under Seattle along the way.
Geologists began rigorously exploring the fault system in the early 1990s, intrigued by gravitational anomalies, uplifted marine terraces (stair-step geological formations along coastlines), and evidence of a roughly 1,000-year-old tsunami. All these features hinted at a major, shallow earthquake on a local fault zone—likely the 923 event.
But “for a fault that has had so much attention, there’s so much we still don’t know,” said Elizabeth Davis, an earthquake geologist at the University of Washington who led the Geology study.
The most pressing questions are how big quakes on the fault get, how often they hit, and, ultimately, what risks the fault poses to people who live in the Puget Sound area.
“It takes some real geologic sleuthing to get at those tough questions,” Tobin said.
Biggest Seattle Fault Quakes Are Rare
Davis focused on the activity of the main fault, which can generate the biggest quakes in the Seattle fault zone complex. It was responsible for the 923 quake. But the existing record went back only about 5,000 years.
“We just don’t know what the recurrence interval for these big quakes is,” Davis said. “We wanted to lengthen the record.”
To do so, Davis and her collaborators turned to marine terraces, the oldest of which date back to the end of the last ice age about 11,000 years ago. The quake in 923 raised terraces by about 8 meters (26 feet), and scientists wanted to look for similar-scale uplift in terraces all around the sound.
The researchers mapped more than 150 terraces around Puget Sound and measured their depths. After accounting for regional slopes, they estimated uplift over time that could have been caused by quakes.
They found that in that 11,000-year period, only the 923 event generated significant uplift. Thick sediment mantles could mask smaller events but not 923-scale quakes, Davis said.
Estimating true recurrence intervals requires knowing the timing of multiple events. But the finding is “not bad news,” she said. It provides some evidence that the recurrence interval is likely not shorter than about 5,000 years.
“That could give us more of a buffer between now and when the next big one like that will happen,” said Stephen Angster, a U.S. Geological Survey geologist who led the GSA Bulletin study.
Smaller, Damaging Quakes Are More Frequent
Angster’s work focused on Seattle’s secondary faults, which are smaller, mostly blind faults (those not visible at the surface) capable of generating damaging earthquakes. Previous work had shown that one of these secondary faults generated a magnitude 6.7 earthquake, highlighting the risk they pose. Angster wanted to explore rupture histories of these secondary faults, particularly whether they could rupture independently from the main fault.
The researchers used a suite of paleoseismic tools, including magnetic data, field and lidar mapping, trenches dug across faults, and geochronology. They studied two newly identified secondary faults that have orientations similar to the main fault.
They found three new earthquakes to add to the region’s seismic history, including the oldest and youngest events in the known record, which were around 11,000 years ago and in the early 1800s, respectively. The earthquakes appear to be evidence of ruptures that occurred independently of the main fault, suggesting that the smaller—but still dangerous—secondary faults should be considered in hazard modeling.
With that lengthened record and the addition of three quakes, the recurrence interval the researchers found was about every 350 years over the past 2,500 years. This timing refined the previous estimate of every several hundred years.
There also appears to be an increase in activity over the past 2,000 years.
“Maybe we should be paying attention to that,” Angster said.
What Happens Next
“There are other earthquakes that aren’t as big but that occur more frequently. Those might not be as catastrophic, but it would be a very bad scenario for Seattle” if such events occurred.
“These are both carefully done studies,” Tobin said. “We now have evidence that the 923 event was the biggest in 11,000 years. But there are other earthquakes that aren’t as big but that occur more frequently. Those might not be as catastrophic, but it would be a very bad scenario for Seattle” if such events occurred.
It’s still to be determined whether the risk from secondary faults will be incorporated into the National Seismic Hazard Model, which includes the 923 quake but not smaller ones along the Seattle fault zone. The secondary faults were left out in previous efforts because they are shorter than the minimum length required to be included and because of uncertainties in their potential rupture magnitude.
Citation: Dzombak, R. (2026), On the Seattle Fault, the biggest quakes aren’t the most likely, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260114. Published on 14 April 2026.
Login
