US top diplomatβs Tiananmen comments βsmearβ China, Beijing says

China accused the United States on Thursday of distorting facts and smearing its political system, after Secretary of State Marco Rubio said censorship could not βeraseβ the memory of Beijingβs 1989 Tiananmen crackdown.

On June 4 that year, the Chinese government sent troops and tanks to crush protests calling for political reform in and around Beijingβs Tiananmen Square.
The death toll remains unknown, and discussion of what happened is censored in mainland China.
Rubio told a news conference on Wednesday that βno amount of censorship can erase the pastβ.
βThose who sacrificed to uphold their unalienable rights of free expression and peaceful assembly will be vindicated someday,β he said.
Chinaβs foreign ministry said Thursday it firmly opposed Rubioβs comments.
βThe Chinese government has long since reached a clear conclusion regarding that political turmoil that occurred in the late 1980s,β ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told a regular news briefing.
βThe relevant erroneous remarks by the US side distort historical facts, smear Chinaβs political system and development path, and interfere in Chinaβs internal affairs,β she said.
This year, authorities reportedly prevented the families of those who died in 1989 from visiting their graves at Beijingβs Wanβan Cemetery, with Amnesty International calling the move βa heartless actβ.
Beijing has also moved in recent years to snuff out all public commemorations in Hong Kong, where an annual candlelight vigil had been held for decades before the imposition of a national security law in 2020.

AFP reporters saw a heavy police presence on Wednesday near Hong Kongβs Victoria Park, the former site of the event.
Late that night, activist Tang Ngok-kwan stood alone in the park, reading the names of hundreds of victims in a low voice under the watchful eyes of several plainclothes police officers.
Derek Chu, a former district councillor who has been giving out free candles in his shop every anniversary since 2022, told AFP that βthe space for (free) speech is more and more narrowβ.
